Donald Trump and US politics

I thought Donald Trump's whole wall thing was the dumbest shit ever, but then I just read GGG's manifesto for their ideas on ES nerfs.

Donald Trump is now a prodigal genius in comparison.
(b) Personal abuse, foul language, inappropriate subject matter, obscene, harassing, threatening, hateful, or discriminatory or defamatory remarks of any nature ... are not permitted.

- PoE TOS.
"
SnowCrash wrote:
The conspiracy for Seth Rich is that The DNC or Clinton had him killed? I would think a professional hit man would've made sure he was actually dead. He ended up dying at the hospital which doesn't look like a professional hit. It took 12 days for the info to hit Wikileaks? The private investigator Rod Wheeler is a Trump supporter who was hired by another Trump supporter and not the family of Seth Rich. He also lied about how long he was with the police and that he was fired. Admitted he has no proof of anything. The DC police, FBI, and the family of the Seth Rich say the story is made up.

So you'll bend over backwards to believe that but the Russian investigation is just to far out there for you?
You are presenting a false dichotomy of a sort. I don't believe all those things, and I don't disbelieve all those things either.

To clarify:
* WikiLeaks, via both it's Twitter and Assange, has stopped short of saying it was Rich but have deliberately cultivated the unmistakable implication that it is. Assange talked about how the Rich murder is troubling as a potential scarecrow for future WikiLeaks contributors, WikiLeaks has offered a cash reward for information leading to conviction, etc.
* You're correct in pointing out that the reported physical evidence of the murder does not fit a well-executed professional assassination. However, it doesn't fit a well-executed robbery, either, nor a poorly-executed one. What it does fit is assault with a deadly weapon committed by an amateur — that is, an otherwise normal person. It is not reasonable to expect conspiracy to murder; it could have been someone acting alone, such as someone with whom Rich shared his WikiLeaks secret and who was being transferred to the Clinton Campaign as Rich was. Or maybe a random apolitical homicidal maniac.
* Afterwards, Brad Bauman was assigned to the family as its spokesman. The Rich family is not, um, rich, so having such a hot-shot PR guy is probably beyond them. Unless Bauman is pro bono, he's likely paid by Democrats. Additionally, Seth Rich was a Democrat and his family likely is as well. If Rich was WikiLeaks' source, his motivation was almost certainly pro-Bernie, not pro-Republican, and I think, had Seth lived, he'd have had extreme difficulty deciding if Clinton or Trump is the lesser evil.
* Wheeler either is or was party to fake news.
* The US government campaign against Russia began on or around June 7, according to legiative history of key anti-Russia bills passed late in the Obama presidency. Since Rich was murdered on June 10, this would indicate truly incredible coordination. More likely, elements of the military-industrial complex decided to go after Russia first and manufacture consent second.
* A December report by a private firm blamed Russia for the leaks, after refusing the FBI and providing no solid evidence of hacking to the public.

In summation: Seth Rich is likely the source of the DNC leaks and was probably murdered by someone he knew, acting relatively alone and not informing any higher chain of command within the DNC. Seeing this, the DNC, despite no direct knowledge of Rich's murder, connected enough dots to realize there is a significant chance they employ the murderer(s) and have gone into defense mode as a result, since such a revelation would still be damning if both true and public. Hence Bauman. Later, Russia was chosen as a convenient scapegoat instead of Rich for their narrative.
When Stephen Colbert was killed by HYDRA's Project Insight in 2014, the comedy world lost a hero. Since his life model decoy isn't up to the task, please do not mistake my performance as political discussion. I'm just doing what Steve would have wanted.
Last edited by ScrotieMcB#2697 on May 18, 2017, 3:50:30 AM
Nancy Pelosi is already talking down Mueller, she's one step away from calling him a Russian agent. I bet if it turns out that Trump isn't Putin's fuccboi, Dems still won't accept it.
GGG banning all political discussion shortly after getting acquired by China is a weird coincidence.
"
鬼殺し wrote:


GOOD LUCK CALLING THAT FAKE NEWS. LOL.
From Wikipedia:
"
he became involved in anti-colonial and African nationalist politics, joining the ANC in 1943 and co-founding its Youth League in 1944. After the National Party's white-only government established apartheid—a system of racial segregation that privileged whites—he and the ANC committed themselves to its overthrow. Mandela was appointed President of the ANC's Transvaal branch, rising to prominence for his involvement in the 1952 Defiance Campaign and the 1955 Congress of the People. He was repeatedly arrested for seditious activities and was unsuccessfully prosecuted in the 1956 Treason Trial. Influenced by Marxism, he secretly joined the banned South African Communist Party (SACP). Although initially committed to non-violent protest, in association with the SACP he co-founded the militant Umkhonto we Sizwe in 1961 and led a sabotage campaign against the government. In 1962, he was arrested for conspiring to overthrow the state and sentenced to life imprisonment in the Rivonia Trial.
Declares guerilla war (ish) on established government, arrested for and convicted of conspiring to overthrow the government. I mean, I get that the National Party were fucksticks, but he utilized means considered illegal in most any civilized country and justice was served in that regard. Roughly equivalent to if Chelsea Manning ran for office.
When Stephen Colbert was killed by HYDRA's Project Insight in 2014, the comedy world lost a hero. Since his life model decoy isn't up to the task, please do not mistake my performance as political discussion. I'm just doing what Steve would have wanted.
Last edited by ScrotieMcB#2697 on May 18, 2017, 3:20:43 AM
Let's pretend Trump said "worse and more unfairly."
When Stephen Colbert was killed by HYDRA's Project Insight in 2014, the comedy world lost a hero. Since his life model decoy isn't up to the task, please do not mistake my performance as political discussion. I'm just doing what Steve would have wanted.
Obama lied more.
When Stephen Colbert was killed by HYDRA's Project Insight in 2014, the comedy world lost a hero. Since his life model decoy isn't up to the task, please do not mistake my performance as political discussion. I'm just doing what Steve would have wanted.
That "badass" Sheriff Clarke is not only incompetent(4 people died in his jail, including a baby), he seems to be phony too. I thought all that stuff he had pinned on his uniform meant something, I thought he had earned achievements on the military or something like that, but according to what this guy is saying:

https://twitter.com/cmclymer/status/864953837714628608

He could replace some of that shit with button pins from some rock bands and wouldn't make any difference.

Like that dude said:
"
12/ But a grown-ass adult arranging his uniform in a way with novelty pins to give the appearance of being highly decorated? What the fuck.


Spoiler


Also, I never noticed how much Americans loved Russians before Trump:



---------

Erdogan's goons on US soil:



(Buzzfeed article for those that can't see the image.

https://twitter.com/i/videos/tweet/864911198512455680

(Original tweet for the video

----------

Someone should call spicer, to see if he is okay
Spoiler




"
soneka101 wrote:
Also, I never noticed how much Americans loved Russians before Trump:

Obviously Clarke was up to some shady shit he didn't want anyone to know about, so he posted the photo to his Twitter.

Could you possibly be any more russophobic?

PS Updated Seth Rich post on previous page.
When Stephen Colbert was killed by HYDRA's Project Insight in 2014, the comedy world lost a hero. Since his life model decoy isn't up to the task, please do not mistake my performance as political discussion. I'm just doing what Steve would have wanted.
Last edited by ScrotieMcB#2697 on May 18, 2017, 3:57:18 AM
"
ScrotieMcB wrote:
"
SnowCrash wrote:
The conspiracy for Seth Rich is that The DNC or Clinton had him killed? I would think a professional hit man would've made sure he was actually dead. He ended up dying at the hospital which doesn't look like a professional hit. It took 12 days for the info to hit Wikileaks? The private investigator Rod Wheeler is a Trump supporter who was hired by another Trump supporter and not the family of Seth Rich. He also lied about how long he was with the police and that he was fired. Admitted he has no proof of anything. The DC police, FBI, and the family of the Seth Rich say the story is made up.

So you'll bend over backwards to believe that but the Russian investigation is just to far out there for you?
You are presenting a false dichotomy of a sort. I don't believe all those things, and I don't disbelieve all those things either.

To clarify:
* WikiLeaks, via both it's Twitter and Assange, has stopped short of saying it was Rich but have deliberately cultivated the unmistakable implication that it is. Assange talked about how the Rich murder is troubling as a potential scarecrow for future WikiLeaks contributors, WikiLeaks has offered a cash reward for information leading to conviction, etc.
* You're correct in pointing out that the reported physical evidence of the murder does not fit a well-executed professional assassination. However, it doesn't fit a well-executed robbery, either, nor a poorly-executed one. What it does fit is assault with a deadly weapon committed by an amateur — that is, an otherwise normal person. It is not reasonable to expect conspiracy to murder; it could have been someone acting alone, such as someone with whom Rich shared his WikiLeaks secret and who was being transferred to the Clinton Campaign as Rich was. Or maybe a random apolitical homicidal maniac.
* Afterwards, Brad Bauman was assigned to the family as its spokesman. The Rich family is not, um, rich, so having such a hot-shot PR guy is probably beyond them. Unless Bauman is pro bono, he's likely paid by Democrats. Additionally, Seth Rich was a Democrat and his family likely is as well. If Rich was WikiLeaks' source, his motivation was almost certainly pro-Bernie, not pro-Republican, and I think, had Seth lived, he'd have had extreme difficulty deciding if Clinton or Trump is the lesser evil.
* Wheeler either is or was party to fake news.
* The US government campaign against Russia began on or around June 7, according to legiative history of key anti-Russia bills passed late in the Obama presidency. Since Rich was murdered on June 10, this would indicate truly incredible coordination. More likely, elements of the military-industrial complex decided to go after Russia first and manufacture consent second.
* A December report by a private firm blamed Russia for the leaks, after refusing the FBI and providing no solid evidence of hacking to the public.

In summation: Seth Rich is likely the source of the DNC leaks and was probably murdered by someone he knew, acting relatively alone and not informing any higher chain of command within the DNC. Seeing this, the DNC, despite no direct knowledge of Rich's murder, connected enough dots to realize there is a significant chance they employ the murderer(s) and have gone into defense mode as a result, since such a revelation would still be damning if both true and public. Hence Bauman. Later, Russia was chosen as a convenient scapegoat instead of Rich for their narrative.



How doesn't this fit a poorly executed robbery? Are you trying to tell me he couldn't have been shot and the guy run off? Its the easiest explanation. Also, Wikileaks is highly partisan on its twitter and i doubt if Seth Rich was the leaker he would give his name.

You have to make a dozen guesses and come to the conclusion that its a likely outcome. Sounds like this has more to do with politics then logic. Basically just doing the same thing you accuse the left of doing.
"
ScrotieMcB wrote:
Obviously Clarke was up to some shady shit he didn't want anyone to know about, so he posted the photo to his Twitter.

Could you possibly be any more russophobic?

PS Updated Seth Rich post on previous page.


I'm not being russophobic, I don't think that being loved by americans is a bad thing. I'm sure it has its perks. (*said in a joking tone*)

About the twitter thing, I don't remember writing that he was up to some shady shit. But if you want to make assumption of me making assumptions, feel free to do it.

My point is that before Trump: "The cold war never ended!"

After Trump: "Everyone has at least 1 russian friend!"

It's a funny contrast.

-------

About that:
"
* WikiLeaks, via both it's Twitter and Assange, has stopped short of saying it was Rich but have deliberately cultivated the unmistakable implication that it is. Assange talked about how the Rich murder is troubling as a potential scarecrow for future WikiLeaks contributors, WikiLeaks has offered a cash reward for information leading to conviction, etc.


They basically offered statements that they can back away from anytime then?

He said he "could be a scarecrow for future wikileaks contributors", so people could perceive him as someone that tried to leak but got killed, although people might believe that, it doesn't mean that it happened. They offered cash for info, but they themselves never said they have any info, have they?

So, they are fanning the flames of suspicion without taking risks.

Smart dudes, low investment high reward.

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info