The Real True Behind PVP devlopment that nobody see (IMO)
" lol are you kidding me? they fixed those 2 things because of little time that it took to do that. they had just to change a number for rf and introduce a new gem to stop ppl whining and making 10 post forum per day just because they didnt understand a shit and couldnt find a proper counter to a build. imo pvp after block reduction is maybe worst too, a lot more based on 1 shot than how was before. PvP Team Omniscient IGN: aBearTrap / AnExplosiveArrow [quote="MullaXul"]ICU + alpha, bad idea[/quote] Last edited by tempallo#5614 on Jun 21, 2014, 4:41:41 AM
|
|
On LLD, the block pen gem is great.
On HLD, the biggest complain i get is that rangers have 100% block pen. On PVE, those block penetrate node by the ranger are sorta useless. They could stay the way they are minus the block pen and PvErs wouldn't care. So now that we have a block pen gem with a down side (you have to use it in ur links) why dont we remove all block pen nodes from the tree (like they did for templar) and we adopt block pen gem if we need it for our build. Is this a worthy sacrifice that rangers are willing to take in the name of balancing in HLD? I'll let the rest answer that. IGN: @GreenDude Last edited by GreenDude#3233 on Jun 21, 2014, 12:28:19 PM
|
|
" Hell no. But should we care what they want? Hell no. Build diversity has dropped because of the conjunction of block penetration gem and passives. That was a huge mistake. |
|