GGG Can you just let us know you are dropping POE1 Support so we stop waiting?

"

BaumisMagicalWorld#0673 wrote:

In my own experience, private profile posters tend to want to hide something or are purposely being disingenuous when posting and don't want to be called out. All the chinese farmers I've encountered are also set to private.

And we wouldn't even need to look far anyway: It's a proven fact that people who hide behind anonymity tend to act in ways they would never if their info was publicly available.

So, yeah, I'm also one of those who tends to be skeptical about posters who hide their profiles.

The only time profile matters is when someone asks for help and you need to see their characters in order to do just that... help.
Everything else is just you being nosy or finding ways to belittle people by profiles.

"

Fapmobile#0758 wrote:

"

BaumisMagicalWorld#0673 wrote:

In my own experience, private profile posters tend to want to hide something or are purposely being disingenuous when posting and don't want to be called out. All the chinese farmers I've encountered are also set to private.

And we wouldn't even need to look far anyway: It's a proven fact that people who hide behind anonymity tend to act in ways they would never if their info was publicly available.

So, yeah, I'm also one of those who tends to be skeptical about posters who hide their profiles.

The only time profile matters is when someone asks for help and you need to see their characters in order to do just that... help.
Everything else is just you being nosy or finding ways to belittle people by profiles.

I disagree. When you join a public discussion [board] on a specific topic, you must lay open your credentials. This [forum] isn't much different. There's a big difference between belittling someone and disputing facts.

This is an example of belittling:

"

oestergreen#1184 wrote:

Should GGG balance encounters around people who open their passive tree and random-click 80 skillpts and call it a day and expect to clear content/bosses?

This is an example of both:

"

BaumisMagicalWorld#0673 wrote:

"

Arcturus_Blake#6989 wrote:

well ''git good'' is the only decent reply

It just means your build or your gameplay suck

I love how your 4 Deadeyes are lvl 95, 95, 94 and 92.

You have a single lvl 100 character, dude. And it's a full tank Carrion Golem build. All you play is some type of ranged build, with the exception of a Cyclone guy.

It's always hilarious to me where these "git gud" comments are coming from.

If you are going to join a discussion about melee or melee range builds having a harder time with leveling up with the existing EXP penalty, and if all you are playing is ranged builds, then you don't have a leg to stand on. Any and all following "git gud" comments are automatically invalidated. I don't think I need to explain this logic to anyone.

That is why checking out profiles is neither being nosey or belittling. It's called fact checking. And for the record, most of those that were talking shit and subsequently got called out by me personally, have since changed their profile to private. So, I'd say it's working as intended.

"

666lol666#3140 wrote:

"

Ulsarek#7159 wrote:

What you call a "underwhelming" product already has more players than PoE 1 ever had

Lol, of course it has, most POE1 players play poe2 now because there isn't anything left to do in POE1 anymore. And that is why POE1 can't have a new league because GGG don't want poe2 to look bad when all the POE1 players would return to a good POE1 league!

New leagues don't even reach half of the numbers of what PoE2 has.
Even with a new league the numbers of PoE1 would be significantly lower, and the numbers of PoE2 would still be higher despite the some players moving to the other game.

Workforce is simply the only reason for why there's been nothing for PoE1 so far.
GGG simply puts more work into PoE2 at the moment with the main focus to get the game out of early access, while PoE1 is simply already a fully proper functioning product with little need for attention at the moment.