Goodbye Charan

"

Boem wrote:

"

Turtledove wrote:

Boem,

I like Charan. I enjoyed his posts. I'm sorry he's gone. My expression of sadness and lose was heartfelt. I'm pleased to hear he has another alias. Maybe he will post under that alias more? I hope so.

Your trolling and apparently thinking there is some deep conspiracy or something or that some social experiment or whatever excuses you've made for the strange behavior makes no sense to me. That's okay though. It doesn't have to from my point of view. But just to let you know if you're hoping people understand what you're saying or trying to do, I don't, gibbousmoon doesn't and I suspect most others don't as well.

Pointing out two posters bumped this thread to first page every time it dropped to second while quoting one another and putting platitudes under them instead of letting it run it's natural course is a conspiracy?

You realize the evidence for that is in this thread right.

I simply called them out for that behavior.

I haven't taken issue with anybody posting a sincere reply to the OP even if i consider the OP misguided.

Peace,

-Boem-

"

Turtledove wrote:

"

Boem wrote:

Pointing out two posters bumped this thread to first page every time it dropped to second while quoting one another and putting platitudes under them instead of letting it run it's natural course is a conspiracy?

You realize the evidence for that is in this thread right.

I simply called them out for that behavior.

I haven't taken issue with anybody posting a sincere reply to the OP even if i consider the OP misguided.

Peace,

-Boem-

You jumped to the most likely false conclusion that their posts were made just to bump the thread. This conclusion makes little sense even with the lame evidence you present. Yet you believe they have conspired to bump this thread! Why would they want to bump this thread? You are seemingly so convinced in this silly conspiracy that you bump the thread yourself? Is that why you were obnoxiously bumping this thread? Why would you even CARE that someone bumped the thread? How does that justify you bumping the thread, because it bothered you that they bumped the thread?

You know what Boem. This seems to be making less and less sense to me.

"

Turtledove wrote:

"

Boem wrote:

"

Turtledove wrote:

Boem,

I like Charan. I enjoyed his posts. I'm sorry he's gone. My expression of sadness and lose was heartfelt. I'm pleased to hear he has another alias. Maybe he will post under that alias more? I hope so.

Your trolling and apparently thinking there is some deep conspiracy or something or that some social experiment or whatever excuses you've made for the strange behavior makes no sense to me. That's okay though. It doesn't have to from my point of view. But just to let you know if you're hoping people understand what you're saying or trying to do, I don't, gibbousmoon doesn't and I suspect most others don't as well.

Pointing out two posters bumped this thread to first page every time it dropped to second while quoting one another and putting platitudes under them instead of letting it run it's natural course is a conspiracy?

You realize the evidence for that is in this thread right.

I simply called them out for that behavior.

I haven't taken issue with anybody posting a sincere reply to the OP even if i consider the OP misguided.

Peace,

-Boem-

You jumped to the most likely false conclusion that their posts were made just to bump the thread. This conclusion makes little sense even with the lame evidence you present. Yet you believe they have conspired to bump this thread! Why would they want to bump this thread? You are seemingly so convinced in this silly conspiracy that you bump the thread yourself? Is that why you were obnoxiously bumping this thread? Why would you even CARE that someone bumped the thread? How does that justify you bumping the thread, because it bothered you that they bumped the thread?

You know what Boem. This seems to be making less and less sense to me.

"

Boem wrote:

You realize post's have time-stamps right?

I mean i just look regularly at these forums and see whats up.

And i bump it while responding or to make a point, not for the sake of bumping.

All of you could stop responding to me and i wouldn't bump this thread anymore.

I did it previously for no reason to see if impeacher and farystar would stop bumping if i did it instead to see if their intent was purely to bump and nothing else.

Peace,

-Boem-

"

Turtledove wrote:

1. I doubt they were posting to bump the thread. Why should they care?-)

"

Turtledove wrote:

"

Boem wrote:

You realize post's have time-stamps right?

I mean i just look regularly at these forums and see whats up.

And i bump it while responding or to make a point, not for the sake of bumping.

All of you could stop responding to me and i wouldn't bump this thread anymore.

I did it previously for no reason to see if impeacher and farystar would stop bumping if i did it instead to see if their intent was purely to bump and nothing else.

Peace,

-Boem-

Of course posts have time stamps. Your post is not really making it make more sense to me. I'll update my previous post with the new information you've provided.

1. I doubt they were posting to bump the thread. Why should they care?
2. But even if we assume they did post just to bump the thread, so what? Why should we care?
3. I don't see how your bump posts would likely indicate that the proper answer was 1 above or 2 above?

Here's what I do know though. Looking at the forum thread list, seeing the green indicator on a thread then looking at the thread and seeing the new post is nothing but Boem saying "bump" is Boem being obnoxious. I hope that we can at least agree on that much? :-)

"

Boem wrote:

"

Turtledove wrote:

"

Boem wrote:

You realize post's have time-stamps right?

I mean i just look regularly at these forums and see whats up.

And i bump it while responding or to make a point, not for the sake of bumping.

All of you could stop responding to me and i wouldn't bump this thread anymore.

I did it previously for no reason to see if impeacher and farystar would stop bumping if i did it instead to see if their intent was purely to bump and nothing else.

Peace,

-Boem-

Of course posts have time stamps. Your post is not really making it make more sense to me. I'll update my previous post with the new information you've provided.

1. I doubt they were posting to bump the thread. Why should they care?
2. But even if we assume they did post just to bump the thread, so what? Why should we care?
3. I don't see how your bump posts would likely indicate that the proper answer was 1 above or 2 above?

Here's what I do know though. Looking at the forum thread list, seeing the green indicator on a thread then looking at the thread and seeing the new post is nothing but Boem saying "bump" is Boem being obnoxious. I hope that we can at least agree on that much? :-)

Me doing it blatantly to make a point = obnoxious.

When they do it = totally normal, why should we care.

People like you fascinate me Turtle.

Peace,

-Boem-