Delve Costing Changes
|
This is still garbage
Who did the Math for 3.4.3 |
|
|
Still not a very good situation. I want to delve and grind delves. even if its for minimal returns without the dependency to the mapping aspect.
I understand this isn't on your radar, but I'm just saying. I want to experience this as if it were a able to stand on its own. Not as a supplement to the core game. |
|
|
Lets see if the costs will finaly be good
|
|
|
Cool now at least we can sustain delve runs the same as the top players.
|
|
|
Now we are talking...
|
|
|
This does not sound like it goes nearly far enough in making delves feel accessible. But thank you for the quick response.
Have you done something awesome with [url=http://pathofexile.gamepedia.com/Sire_of_Shards]Sire of Shards[/url]? PM me and tell me all about it!
|
|
|
What about making it so you will always see 3 nodes on a map no matter what. Because currently its kinda depressing seeing 1 node and getting little to nothing for it.
|
|
|
I would like a clarification of what you define as a "Delve". I'm reading stuff about "lenght 2" and "length 6" but what is 1 lenght actually? I thought one "Delve" would be however long I choose to stay in the mine or until I run out? I didn't realise there was a terminology to go with this league...
Overall I think this change is good and I like the current position Delve is in. The people that are complaining now are those that want it to be an alternative, not an addition. Last edited by ELEKTROLL#5459 on Sep 21, 2018, 1:46:06 AM
|
|
|
Great job guys a much needed quick response!
|
|
" 1 square |
|
