The Hungry Loop Unique Ring

Overhyped ring, to niche concidering the new shaper/elder rares. This ring should have been introduced a year or so ago.

"

Vipermagi wrote:

"

codetaku wrote:

You'll get this kind of info way faster if you just accept that the devs hate the forums and love reddit and start spending most of your time there instead of here.

Reddit is a garbagefire. No thanks. :)

Agree!

But codetaku is correct, in that this form gets redirected/muted/censored due to reddit posts being popular or whatever. So not sure which GGG considers its primary means of communication.

So when you vendor a fed loop you get level 20 0% uncorrupted gems? Inb4 you can can clean gems that ripped to 19 via vendoring this item. Also, if the corrupted text is hidden from the item text that could lead to a lot of bullshit scams if someone bought the loop to vendor it.

"

Jaerbcat wrote:

So when you vendor a fed loop you get level 20 0% uncorrupted gems? Inb4 you can can clean gems that ripped to 19 via vendoring this item. Also, if the corrupted text is hidden from the item text that could lead to a lot of bullshit scams if someone bought the loop to vendor it.

I was curious about this as well. Not so much to buy them and vendor for level 20s as you can get those for like 8-12c a piece mostly. But for Empowers that went from 3 to 2. A second chance at an empower 4 could almost be worth losing the ring at anything less than an ex.

way too overhyped. this ring isnt going to find any use on any builds besides extreamly nieche applications. i can see it being good on summoners (guardian setup) and cwdt tanks, thats about it.

i guess the key thing people forget when they talk about the ring is that the consumption is limited to support gems only.

i still like the mechanic but i'd rather have it seen on a helmet/gloves that are limited to 2-3 sockets and can consume 4 gems maybe. that way you can get another 6/7 link for the stat/quality tradeoff.

"

qa346gvwsd4 wrote:

With what it's effect says, does that mean this ring could potentially act as a 5-link item with four supports and one active?

Yes :)

A better name for it would have been Kitava's Grasp, Kitava's Hold, Kitava's Grip, something along those lines probably.

Btw, if you REALLY want people to use this item you should let it consume 5-6 support gems. You can balance it out by giving -Life or ES on the ring for every gem it consumes or something like that.

Otherwise this ring will be selling for alch shards.

"

BlaqWolf wrote:

As long as this damn thing is passably common I'm satisfied with it... Say, exalt drop common. None of this top tier gated crap that only the monied of the elite can buy like Headhunter.
These things should be hitting trade at something like 10 chaos, though 1 alc would be great.

Hear hear.

Kinda tired of watching the rich on rich orgy between tryhards, RMT (streamers), and GGG.

Sidenote:

Everything about this game is stolen.

Theme of company and logo fmv? (Dungeon siege, main menu.)
Passive web? (Final Fantasy.)
Gem system? (Final Fantasy.)
Basically everything else? (Diablo 2.)

I recognize the art skill, and the casino management mind manipulation skill. Hat tip for sure.

But it should be open source if it's gonna be this derivative.

With a community this size does anyone honestly believe any of GGG's ideas DIDN'T come from player comments somewhere?

"

stonespeak wrote:

When will you unlock http://pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/2030521 so we can see community posts?

Honestly, it's just going to be a bunch of complaints, I wouldn't bother.