Donald Trump and US politics

Here's a post I saw on Reddit. With the upcoming fun, I'm looking forward to seeing how the updated numbers look.

"
I made a comment recently where I claimed that Republican administrations had been much more criminally corrupt over the last 50 plus years than the Democrats. I was challenged (dared actually) to prove it. So I did a bit of research and when I say a bit I mean it didn’t take long and there is no comparison.

When comparing criminal indictments of those serving in the executive branch of presidential administrations, it’s so lopsided as to be ridiculous. Yet all I ever hear about is how supposedly “corrupt” the Democrats are. So why don’t we break it down by president and the numbers?

Obama (D) – 8 yrs in office. Zero criminal indictments, zero convictions and zero prison sentences. So the next time somebody describes the Obama administration as “scandal free” they aren’t speaking wishfully, they’re simply telling the truth.
Bush, George W. (R) – 8 yrs in office. 16 criminal indictments. 16 convictions. 9 prison sentences.
Clinton (D) – 8 yrs in office. 2 criminal indictments. One conviction. One prison sentence. That’s right nearly 8 yrs of investigations. Tens of millions spent and 30 yrs of claiming them the most corrupt ever and there was exactly one person convicted of a crime.
Bush, George H. W. (R) – 4 yrs in office. One indictment. One conviction. One prison sentence.
Reagan (R) – 8 yrs in office. 26 criminal indictments. 16 convictions. 8 prison sentences.
Carter (D) – 4 yrs in office. One indictment. Zero convictions and zero prison sentences.
Ford (R) – 4 yrs in office. One indictment and one conviction. One prison sentence.
Nixon (R) – 6 yrs in office. 76 criminal indictments. 55 convictions. 15 prison sentences.
Johnson (D) – 5 yrs in office. Zero indictments. Zero convictions. Zero prison sentences.

So, let’s see where that leaves us. In the last 53 years, Democrats have been in the Oval Office for 25 of those years, while Republicans held it for 28. In their 25 yrs in office Democrats had a total of three executive branch officials indicted with one conviction and one prison sentence. That’s one whole executive branch official convicted of a crime in two and a half decades of Democrat leadership.

In the 28 yrs that Republicans have held office over the last 53 yrs they have had a total of (a drum roll would be more than appropriate), 120 criminal indictments of executive branch officials. 89 criminal convictions and 34 prison sentences handed down. That’s more prison sentences than years in office since 1968 for Republicans. If you want to count articles of impeachment as indictments (they aren’t really but we can count them as an action), both sides get one more. However, Clinton wasn’t found guilty while Nixon resigned and was pardoned by Ford (and a pardon carries with it a legal admission of guilt on the part of the pardoned). So those only serve to make Republicans look even worse.

With everything going on with Trump and his people right now, it’s a safe bet Republicans are gonna be padding their numbers a bit real soon.

So let’s just go over the numbers one more time, shall we? 120 indictments for Republicans. 89 convictions, and 34 prison sentences. Those aren’t “feelings” or “alternate facts.” Those are simply the stats by the numbers. Republicans are, and have been for my entire lifetime, the most criminally corrupt party to hold the office of the presidency.

So those are the actual numbers. Feel free to copy and paste!


And yes, I know some of you feel like Democrats are super corrupt. Hillary Shillary Killary Hitlery feels like one of history's greatest monsters to you. Reality, as usual, is simply not on your side.
No wonder the Trumplets are still trying to convict Obama & Hillary. I guess they feel retroactive convictions are better than none at all?

They'd best get to digging up some Carter crimes while they're at it :)
"
Sarno wrote:
"
That's called evolution of society.

'Evolution of society'


"
Reverse racism for a while will eventually end in a crowd that can stand together in unity.

Reverse racism? Yeah, we have a word for this in Scotland. We call it "racism."


reverse racism isn't the same as racism.

It's favoritism based on perception of racism to a certain group of people.

An example would be to have white people, after the segregation, be asked to move to the back of the bus to allow a more equal distribution of seats.

The article linked a bit earlier is a good example of reverse racism, although I don't agree with the consequences that were infliged to the photograph.

Now, reverse racism is an improvement over regular racism, but it's still not a good thing. Hopefully it will go in the right direction soon.
Build of the week #9 - Breaking your face with style http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_EcQDOUN9Y
IGN: Poltun
The Shitposter in Chief is at it again

GGG banning all political discussion shortly after getting acquired by China is a weird coincidence.
"
Jennik wrote:
Hillary Shillary Killary Hitlery feels like one of history's greatest monsters to you. Reality, as usual, is simply not on your side.

Yeah, the majority of Americans (includes dems, reps, and indeps) that greatly dislike her are all incorrect. If only you controlled the world, right?

The DNC is corrupt. Ask any Bernie supporter -- no need to even risk your life attempting to talk plainly with "the other".
"
Xavderion wrote:
The Shitposter in Chief is at it again



"Not at all presidential."

"
deathflower wrote:
"
ScrotieMcB wrote:
Again, we shouldn't call it "social justice" when it isn't very just. What the slang "social justice warriors" refers to is advocates of intersectional minority-identitarianism.


Don't help the poor. Don't help the underprivileged. Don't help the black. What is your social justice anyway? All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others that kind of equal?

These feuds are just making it true. You might show some unjust people is fighting, but saying they all aren't justified in fighting just make it worse. Injustice always exist, ignoring it, is it willful stubbornness or Cognitive dissonance?

"
CanHasPants wrote:


Capitulation means the death of liberty, and if history be any indication, quite literally tens of millions of people.


Culture is just social habits. Some of them are really bad ones. I can see why Your problem is so deep it is unsolvable. Your liberty is granted by everyone. A republic is a collective liberty, You don't just do it yourself.



There's a big difference between fighting for something and complaining about it. I can write "I hate cancer" on my socks, but that doesn't solve anything. Some of the people complaining might be working towards solutions as well, but the SJWs I've known in real life don't do squat. If there is any risk to themselves or their interests, they side with the very people they are complaining about.

Here's a perfect example from last week - A customer loses it and starts attacking a female employee. A bystander calls security. Security shows up and subdues him after 5 minutes of scuffling (no punches, no kicks, just wrestling and eventually putting him in cuffs). After the perp is hauled away, security gets statements from everyone. After they leave, the woman complains about how security was too rough with the guy, and that they didn't really need to arrest him, and that they should have just talked to him.

That's what an SJW is.
PoE Origins - Piety's story http://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/2081910
Last edited by DalaiLama on Oct 28, 2017, 9:44:05 PM
"
"
Xavderion wrote:
Singer tells white people to move to the back of the crowd, one photographer and some other whiteys refuse to go to the back of the bu- err I mean crowd, festival fires photographer and apologizes for her 'overt racism'. The absolute state of Canada.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/entertainment/lido-pimienta-halifax-festival-1.4375115

Worth the read, it's like straight from The Onion but they're 100% serious. The festival's directors will increase anti-oppression and anti-racism training so that whitey learns his place.


That's called evolution of society. Reverse racism for a while will eventually end in a crowd that can stand together in unity.


It will end with more people like President Trump elected to office, and successful lawsuits against people who violate racial discrimination laws. If these fools were calling out a real injustice, or doing something that was actually good, it could help further their cause. Since they aren't, and since they don't genuinely care about these things, but care more about how the public perceives them, it won't ever happen.

They are all products of the ME ME ME ME ME factory. They would skin kittens alive on stage if they thought the public would adore them more for doing so. The more they try to stand out, the more they make the public realize that they represent everything no one wants.
PoE Origins - Piety's story http://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/2081910
Last edited by DalaiLama on Oct 28, 2017, 9:44:48 PM
"
faerwin wrote:
Now, reverse racism is an improvement over regular racism, but it's still not a good thing. Hopefully it will go in the right direction soon.


Raping these people is better than raping those people? Robbing those people is better than robbing these people? Putting more of group X than group Y in jail for the same crime must be OK then correct?

Racism is racism and anyone who thinks otherwise is a racist.
PoE Origins - Piety's story http://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/2081910
"
No wonder the Trumplets are still trying to convict Obama & Hillary. I guess they feel retroactive convictions are better than none at all?


Retroactive? As opposed to convicting people before the crimes are committed? Who are you using for Precogs - Siri and Alexa?
PoE Origins - Piety's story http://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/2081910

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info