Content Update 2.5.0 Patch Notes

"
day0620 wrote:
Hey GGG, WHY THE FUCK YOU FUCKING NERF "Flask Charge Generation on Critical Strike"?! WHY?! Give me a fucking reasonable answer!!!!! Don't just fucking give me a fucking answer like "We just want to balance the game play or whatever balance something out", these kinds of fucking ridiculous excuses.



imo not the right way, ok pathfinder was way to strong, but with that u also nerfd the wormblaster into the ground ;_;
My Builds & Hideouts: https://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/2083383
Hideout Community Discord: https://discord.gg/B2xQkmf
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/user/Dralanorr
Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/guggelhupf
They nerf super OP meta builds for a reason y'all. Are we going to have to go through this same crybaby bullshit every major patch notes? There is a reason why it is called "SKILL BALANCE" If some skills/items/stats are way outperforming others, it is in the games best interest to nerf them instead of just buffing everything else to match it. It keeps the game fresh and otherwise you would have something beyond power 'creep'.
GitGud, GitNerfed, Repeat.
Last edited by southsidepopper#1989 on Nov 29, 2016, 11:00:09 PM
200% increased Flame Golem damage.

Maybe the quad-golem build will finally work.
Too bad it's not my starting plan.
nerf nerf nerf ... why not buff the bad things instead ?
My Builds & Hideouts: https://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/2083383
Hideout Community Discord: https://discord.gg/B2xQkmf
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/user/Dralanorr
Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/guggelhupf
"
Chalace wrote:
"
day0620 wrote:
Hey GGG, WHY THE FUCK YOU FUCKING NERF "Flask Charge Generation on Critical Strike"?! WHY?! Give me a fucking reasonable answer!!!!! Don't just fucking give me a fucking answer like "We just want to balance the game play or whatever balance something out", these kinds of fucking ridiculous excuses.


Judging by the language of your post, swearing like a 5yr old, you wont listen to reason anyway.
If you can't see why 100% up-time of flasks is too much, then that is your loss.


While I agree that his post was ridiculous, I gotta ask... Uh.. What 5 year olds have you heard swear like that? Wouldn't wanna live in your neighborhood..
"
guggelhupf wrote:
"
day0620 wrote:
Hey GGG, WHY THE FUCK YOU FUCKING NERF "Flask Charge Generation on Critical Strike"?! WHY?! Give me a fucking reasonable answer!!!!! Don't just fucking give me a fucking answer like "We just want to balance the game play or whatever balance something out", these kinds of fucking ridiculous excuses.



imo not the right way, ok pathfinder was way to strong, but with that u also nerfd the wormblaster into the ground ;_;


Yes, I am one of the wormblaster victim.....I feel like in hell now....
"
guggelhupf wrote:
nerf nerf nerf ... why not buff the bad things instead ?


See my above post
GitGud, GitNerfed, Repeat.
"
southsidepopper wrote:
They nerf super OP meta builds for a reason y'all. Are we going to have to go through this same crybaby bullshit every major patch notes? There is a reason why it is called "SKILL BALANCE" If some skills are way outperforming others, it is in the games best interest to nerf them instead of just buffing everything else to match it. It keeps the game fresh and otherwise you would have something beyond power 'creep'.


But that's not "fun" apparently.

~Just to be clear, that was sarcasm, I've seen the level of mentality the majority of posters here possess.
"
Harest wrote:


It says "per active blade" so to me the first is counted too. But i was a little ironic there. I can't imagine such a thing to exist. Especially when you're trying to nerf a skill. I think it's just an error of wording like i saw another one with "increase" and then "more" right after.

About the hit rate it'll be additive too for sure.


ah yeah you're right, i thought it said per additional blade

so if they mean increased and the hit rate is additive at 20 stacks we'd be doing +420% (including the 30% nerf) damage capped at 5 hits per second, which would be a small buff in raw damage over old blade vortex

"
southsidepopper wrote:
They nerf super OP meta builds for a reason y'all. Are we going to have to go through this same crybaby bullshit every major patch notes? There is a reason why it is called "SKILL BALANCE" If some skills are way outperforming others, it is in the games best interest to nerf them instead of just buffing everything else to match it. It keeps the game fresh and otherwise you would have something beyond power 'creep'.


Explain how nerfing the only viable builds into slightly less viable builds keeps the game fresh?

It's not like the sub-par builds/skills can suddenly run Shaper or Uber because the vastly OP builds just became less powerful (and some semi-viable builds get completely ruined in the process).

You make no sense.

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info