Intuitive Leap Bug
|
This is actually really sensible. Why can't Intuitive Leap allow you to have itself allocated without being connected?
" If you want to discuss Inspired learning, then *you* should go to the feedback forum. This is a bug report about Intuitive Leap. Face it, all of your suggestions are worse than this idea:
http://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/657756 |
|
|
Allocate passives towards a Jewel socket, respec everything except the Jewel. Proceed to the next socket.. Yeah, that wouldn't be completely fucking stupid or anything. There's a perfectly logical reason for it not to work like that.
|
|
"Umm... You couldn't remove the Intuitive leap Jewel if it is needed for passives (such as the jewel slot) to be allocated. Face it, all of your suggestions are worse than this idea:
http://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/657756 |
|
|
Meh :/ so many posts about jewels not working I got them mixed up. <knocks on his head with his fist..."this isn't an Inspired Learning thread"
"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning." "Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries!" Last edited by Aragorn14#7418 on May 22, 2016, 8:04:58 PM
|
|
|
You can still get clusters of passives from literally all over the tree; as long as it's within Intuitive Leap range, it only costs 2 points.
Any build could get +1 Endurance Charge, 20% Increased Life, 1.6% Life Regen, 24% Armour/Evasion and 12% All Resists for 6 Passive points. It doesn't matter if all your Passives are located between the Templar and Witch - just invest into the shortest path to the Duelist Jewel socket, and then respec everything between there and your start. You're building CI? You'd still get 1.6% Regen and 1 ECharge for three points. Fucking fantastic. You can't remove Intuitive Leap, oh no. That's a one point tax. Worth noting: a Duelist gets those nodes for 10 points, because they need to take Str/Dex, ECharge duration and the small node before Cloth and Chain. @Dunedain: different Jewel :P Last edited by Vipermagi#0984 on May 22, 2016, 6:24:34 PM
|
|
" Oooh, right. For some reason I thought you'd still have to keep the path up to the Jewel's radius. Thanks for the clarification! Face it, all of your suggestions are worse than this idea:
http://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/657756 |
|
|
As the Jewel is implemented now, you need the path to the Jewel socket itself; that's why it's kind of a mediocre jewel. The proposed "bug fix" would work as I described previously.
(just reiterating to prevent confusion :P ) Last edited by Vipermagi#0984 on May 22, 2016, 6:39:54 PM
|
|
|
I know this post is rather old, but since noone clarified it completely i just wanted to say:
The Intuitive Leap discription says that you can allocate passive nodes that aren't connected to the tree, it does NOT say you can unallocate nodes in between your tree and a node in its radius. Therefor the discription of the jewel is not wrong, you just misinterpreted it. Last edited by VersuchDrei#3369 on Oct 1, 2016, 3:08:57 PM
|
|
" Indeed it does not say you can refund nodes in its radius. However, it also does NOT say "you can allocate...". In fact it reads "... can be allocated...". This wording is entirely ambiguous and can both mean that a passive node can be NEWLY allocated, as you presume, but also that it may REMAIN allocated (after being disconnected by way of refunds). Anyway, it sounds like an amazing mechanic, but as it stands it is funny but lame. |
|
