Put base minion damage into gem description [2 month since reddit -- no response]

"
Fruz wrote:
Let's see if they actually do something for the 'minions league' or if they definitely don't care about the community feedback.


It seems that they don't care unless .... it's an Mtx, which is very sad.


It might show up in the character pannel?

Not all hope is lost!?

Spoiler
though honestly i don't expect them to do this, great as it would be.


Peace,

-Boem-
Freedom is not worth having if it does not include the freedom to make mistakes
lol
IGN: Victory_Or_Sovngarde
It's not a 13 week development cycle, it's a 13 week supporter-pack cycle.
You can play any build you want, as long as it's the current meta.
Bumping this one.

GGG update this spreadsheet please if you are not gonna put minion damage into gem description!!!!

https://www.reddit.com/r/pathofexile/comments/62irsa/official_minion_damage_spreadsheet_from_ggg/
This thread will be 5 years old in the not-too-distant future.
IGN: Victory_Or_Sovngarde
It's not a 13 week development cycle, it's a 13 week supporter-pack cycle.
You can play any build you want, as long as it's the current meta.
lol
IGN: Victory_Or_Sovngarde
It's not a 13 week development cycle, it's a 13 week supporter-pack cycle.
You can play any build you want, as long as it's the current meta.
5 year old thread in 1 month.
IGN: Victory_Or_Sovngarde
It's not a 13 week development cycle, it's a 13 week supporter-pack cycle.
You can play any build you want, as long as it's the current meta.
They did not do it for the minion league ;')

I think that it clearly shows that :
- they don't care about in the slightest
- they are absolutely fine with basic information being very obscure to players
SSF is not and will never be a standard for balance, it is not for people entitled to getting more without trading.
Last edited by Fruz#6137 on Nov 13, 2019, 1:38:01 AM
I don't think there should be any damage numbers for any skills at all...

That would leave a lot more experimenting for players to dabble in instead of playing Path of Building...
"
Cyzax wrote:
I don't think there should be any damage numbers for any skills at all...

That would leave a lot more experimenting for players to dabble in instead of playing Path of Building...


+1
Need a new signature, cuz name change. I dunno though. I guess this seems fine. Yeah, this is good.
Agree. We should also go ahead and obscure all numeric info on the passive tree and items too.
Maximum exploration & experimentation. A genuine wraeclast experience.
IGN: Victory_Or_Sovngarde
It's not a 13 week development cycle, it's a 13 week supporter-pack cycle.
You can play any build you want, as long as it's the current meta.

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info