Perz' Low Life Righteous Fire Cycloner
" My damage without RF is about 63k atm. I will post more screenshots soon. Spell damage improves both elemental and physical damage, that's why it's much better here. IGN: Perz | Reaver: view-thread/523959 | Wander: view-thread/742525 | Cycloner: view-thread/804489
| |
first of all thx for ur answers.
what are u doing vs cold dmg? u dont have any item with canot be frozen are u able to shock constantly with the q added lightning dmg and the tamming? -~Shop for the price awarded player~- view-thread/375747 Last edited by trashs1#3679 on Mar 6, 2014, 6:48:35 AM
|
|
I use a mana flask to dispell frozen & chilled. If you don't like that you can also use dream fragments.
As I mentioned in the first post, all targets that don't die instantly will be shocked most of the time due to high attack speed. IGN: Perz | Reaver: view-thread/523959 | Wander: view-thread/742525 | Cycloner: view-thread/804489
| |
thx a lot
-~Shop for the price awarded player~- view-thread/375747 |
|
Sick, sick build man, I will be trying a spin off of this soon :)
IGN: KiPad
Mirror Services (/view-thread/778747): #1 Crit Rings for *ALL* builds (Low-life, CI, and Life), #1 1H Axe, #1 Ar Boots, #1 Life Rustic |
|
" Why? You do know that RF doesn't reflect right? |
|
" it's to decrease his damage output I believe. IGN: Smegacore
|
|
" Ofc I know that degenerating damage such as RF damage cannot be reflected. " Exactly :) IGN: Perz | Reaver: view-thread/523959 | Wander: view-thread/742525 | Cycloner: view-thread/804489
| |
Hey.
I worked on a similar build. Very nice dps. EDIT : Did you tried with a RRRGGB shav and added fire damage instead of added lightning? Or the 10% chance to shock is absolutly necessary? Last edited by Evelyus#3421 on Mar 7, 2014, 5:47:30 AM
|
|
" Hey. The best I could do was 4 off colours on Shavs so I just used that gem. I was thinking since trash mobs are 1-hits anyways, I'd rather use 15% shock vs strong enemies. IGN: Perz | Reaver: view-thread/523959 | Wander: view-thread/742525 | Cycloner: view-thread/804489
|