Quest Reward List

Thanks for the data, it has been added. Generally white background indicates old data, the light blue we are currently using is more recent.
To the sheet 'admins': is it still desired to double-check the entries? Otherwise I would mark my additions (new and existent) also with the 'regulary' light-blue background, and remove my purple signings.
invited by timer @ 10.12.2011
--
deutsche Community: www.exiled.eu & ts.exiled.eu
I've been double-checking things (mostly in thinking, "Oh, has this been updated yet?" And then yes, it is.) Considering the new influx of color, the extra color background is a bit confusing. I think just using the blue or perhaps another neutral-ish color would be useful to say, "This is absolutely correct and up-to-date."
I suggest that we use the very pale yellow to indicate data that is confirmed to be current, and leave the background white for old/unconfirmed info. It is a very subtle indicator that has good visibility for the new font colours and will blend in with the normally white background.
I just wanted to ask since I knew that Coldet had checked entries from other writers again to confirm the data, and then marked it blue for the confirmation, aka double-check/validated.

And so far, the still remaining question is: who is trusted to be allowed to confirm data?
invited by timer @ 10.12.2011
--
deutsche Community: www.exiled.eu & ts.exiled.eu
Added some more new data from my witch (2nd act cruel rewards), first input into the 'new' sheet.

Impression: its a bit more effort to not ending up confused - you cannot longer simply overwrite the entries as the old are also colour formatted and this is kept.

Also noticed that some entries I copied are wrong coloured - I adjusted this where I've seen it. (examples: red Added Lightning Damage and Minion Life)

Now at a check for the examples above, I again noticed that sometimes entries seem to get lost (ot at least were not shown correct) - actually I see no entries for Brutus on Default, Witch, and I'm sure I had put the data in.
invited by timer @ 10.12.2011
--
deutsche Community: www.exiled.eu & ts.exiled.eu
For new additions the idea was the use the chart on pg 3 of the sheet to copy and paste preformated rewards into a small list then cut and paste it to the original sheet.

Quickly looking at revision history it would seem some editors are just typing in the rewards based on the typos and inconsistencies. For the missing section of the witch rewards, someone deleted the info and declined to add anything back.
"
Zanarhi wrote:
For the missing section of the witch rewards, someone deleted the info and declined to add anything back.


added them back in from my paper sheets ^^

(good to have it kept, first was full recently)
invited by timer @ 10.12.2011
--
deutsche Community: www.exiled.eu & ts.exiled.eu
Last edited by Mr_Cee#0334 on Aug 10, 2012, 3:18:28 PM
"
Mr_Cee wrote:
Now at a check for the examples above, I again noticed that sometimes entries seem to get lost (ot at least were not shown correct) - actually I see no entries for Brutus on Default, Witch, and I'm sure I had put the data in.


I just look at witch section, and it seems that your first entry in Normal Brutus has been moved to Merciless Brutus.

Is anyone can confirm Brutus reward on Merciless ?

edit : i removed the checked color from Merciless Brutus of witch for the moment.
Last edited by Kissan#7229 on Aug 11, 2012, 6:16:11 PM
awesome!

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info