Donald Trump and US politics

"
SarahAustin wrote:
"
Aim_Deep wrote:
What she admitted it doh. Just claimed it was within state dept guidelines.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton_email_controversy#Use_of_private_server_for_government_business


So it was within guidelines. GG WP
]

It wasn't which was why the FBI had a criminal investigation going. Loretta Lynch intervened, told Comey to drop the case, and shortly after, everything cleared.

Loretta Lynch will likely be indicted before the summer is over. Comey will probably cut a deal to save himself.

There's also plenty of verified emails from Hillary on Wikileaks, aside from her admitting guilt.

Lastly, several of the emails that she sent out that were highly classified, were reclassified later at a lower level while the investigation was going, and done so at the request of people protecting Hillary. Expect all of those people to either testify or go to prison.

Once they are done prosecuting that, Trump will open up Benghazi. It's going to be an ugly year and a half for the democrats.
PoE Origins - Piety's story http://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/2081910
"
DalaiLama wrote:
"
SarahAustin wrote:
"
Aim_Deep wrote:
What she admitted it doh. Just claimed it was within state dept guidelines.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton_email_controversy#Use_of_private_server_for_government_business


So it was within guidelines. GG WP
]

It wasn't which was why the FBI had a criminal investigation going. Loretta Lynch intervened, told Comey to drop the case, and shortly after, everything cleared.

Loretta Lynch will likely be indicted before the summer is over. Comey will probably cut a deal to save himself.

There's also plenty of verified emails from Hillary on Wikileaks, aside from her admitting guilt.

Lastly, several of the emails that she sent out that were highly classified, were reclassified later at a lower level while the investigation was going, and done so at the request of people protecting Hillary. Expect all of those people to either testify or go to prison.

Once they are done prosecuting that, Trump will open up Benghazi. It's going to be an ugly year and a half for the democrats.



But there will be few liberals who will be

Spoiler



LA LA LA LA LA LA, but but but Trump said mean thing once 12 years ago in the bathroom, and Russians Russians Russians.


"
Aim_Deep wrote:
Not so sure about that about that last part ScrotieMcB other than secondary benefit. I think Deep state is making sure Trump does not endanger the massive military/security complex budget by restoring normal relations with Russia.

M16s for Jihadis are cheap

New thermonuclear weapons and subs for Russia not so much

Just way they like it

Like I said before if they could make Afghanistan last 500 years they would. Sooner or later public will grow tied if we actually tried to kick Taliban out with all the death. Plus is just not that expensive. So Lets get back to cold war 2.0 is MO for major profitability.

Just business. Nothing personal is what this Russia hysteria is all about.

Hell best part is they even got the dems wanting rooskie blood meaning social welfare can take a nap while MIC makes a killing.
I kinda understand why your mind went MIC, but I said Trump hates the MSM primarily. I don't think Trump is particularly savvy and/or oppositional regarding the MIC but might occasionally undermine them by lashing out pseudorandomly against propaganda. Despite being somewhat clueless he'll never go full neocon because domestic economics is his first priority.

The "we need to scapegoat someone for election fraud" part is caused by the DNC's behavior last year. The choice of Russia as scapegoat is precisely the reasons you already believe; anti-Russia legislation was in the pipes over a year ago.
When Stephen Colbert was killed by HYDRA's Project Insight in 2014, the comedy world lost a hero. Since his life model decoy isn't up to the task, please do not mistake my performance as political discussion. I'm just doing what Steve would have wanted.
Last edited by ScrotieMcB#2697 on Jun 16, 2017, 10:22:22 AM
A solid chess move. I bet Rod Rosenstein will recuse himself.



Btw, next in line would be Rachel Brand, and she's totally /ourgal/.
GGG banning all political discussion shortly after getting acquired by China is a weird coincidence.
Last edited by Xavderion#3432 on Jun 16, 2017, 12:42:42 PM
Remember when I won a screenshot contest and made everyone butt-hurt? Pepperidge Farm remembers.
There is no deep State. There are only the Koch brothers and their ilk plus the Bankers.
"Gratitude is wine for the soul. Go on. Get drunk." Rumi
US Mountain Time Zone
This whole Russian thing is unbelievable for many reasons. Russia is basically North Korea with more nukes. Extremely poor. Avg salary of like $300 a month. Yet somehow theres a Russian under every plot to destabilize west? What good is our very expensive 17 counter intelligence agencies (NSA FBI etc) whos budget is more than Russians whole defense budget if they cant even stop that? Then you have fact no one thought Trump could win so why would Russia piss incoming Hillary off even more who pundits say had it in for Russians? Then as you say these sanctions plans were in the pipe over a year but Obama restrained Congress going as far to call them and intel community war mongers. But Obama was a relatively popular president so they didnt push it too hard.

While Motives are lacking on Russian side to meddle in elections they are plenty for West to create Russia boogeyman Russia is upsetting our plans to turn Syria in Jihadi playground like Libya. They resisted color revolution in Ukraine as well. Two places which have Russian bases. Then like I said the whole wonderful expense uparming for an adversary like Russia. Not that we cant destroy them 200x over already but that money is spent. Need new.
Git R Dun!
Last edited by Aim_Deep#3474 on Jun 16, 2017, 3:01:52 PM
"
Wraeclastian wrote:


that quote aged well
"
ChanBalam wrote:
There is no deep State.
I don't think it's remotely reasonable to claim the deep state doesn't exist.

"Deep" in this case refers to relative immunity to election; the less likely one is to lose one's position as the result of election, the deeper. State refers to wielding the power of government; the more power involved, the "statier." Thus, the Deep State refers to those entrenched officials of the bureaucracy who wield great power with a minimum of electoral oversight.

Now you might counter this with: "all Executive Branch employees serve at the pleasure of the President." But that's an oversimplification, isn't it? Yes, Trump fired Comey, but was he able to do so with impunity? No, he got flak for it. If Trump dismissed all Executive Branch employees, he would be crucified by the media, accused of attempted dictatorship, and pressed to resign by a Republican Congress. The Deep State forms complicated alliances with various members of the press to threaten, counterattack, and even alpha-strike the White House. Using real news when possible, rumor and innuendo otherwise, the Deep State prevents true fealty to the chief Executive to protect its own interests and ensure its perpetual survival.

So let's drop this act of pretending​the Deep State doesn't exist, shall we? What you really mean to say is: you want them to beat up on Trump for you. #Resist.
When Stephen Colbert was killed by HYDRA's Project Insight in 2014, the comedy world lost a hero. Since his life model decoy isn't up to the task, please do not mistake my performance as political discussion. I'm just doing what Steve would have wanted.
"
diablofdb wrote:
"
Wraeclastian wrote:


that quote aged well


If you enjoyed that, you will really enjoy this list of Hillary quotes.

http://truthfeed.com/8-actual-hillary-quotes/8825/
Remember when I won a screenshot contest and made everyone butt-hurt? Pepperidge Farm remembers.

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info