[2.2 updated, sub 5 min lab run video] low life kinetic blast by ddddddddddddddddddddime

TYVM for the mirror service

very nice

did a quick update with new gear. Once someone changes the colours on my corrupted rainbowstrides I will actually try them out. Some pretty insane ES amounts by wearing 2 of my rings.

Minor gear update, tried double reflect with empowered anger and wrath along with life leech gem using lioneye's paws = 0 problems.

Also coloured my +1 rainbows to RRRB, have not tried double reflect on them however.

Added some gearing setups at the end of the original post as well.

currently using



81/110/106 resists, 8300 ES, 117K dps (vs 132.7k with lioneyes paws)

Will try double reflect as soon as I can.

edit: even double reflect is a joke, my ES doesn't move even by using absolutely no flasks at all. Will probably stick with this set up for a little while, I like the 8300 ES for leveling and the dps isn't that bad (from 132.7k to 117k)

"

stzbttln wrote:

currently using

81/110/106 resists, 8300 ES, 117K dps (vs 132.7k with lioneyes paws)

Will try double reflect as soon as I can.

edit: even double reflect is a joke, my ES doesn't move even by using absolutely no flasks at all. Will probably stick with this set up for a little while, I like the 8300 ES for leveling and the dps isn't that bad (from 132.7k to 117k)

switch your shield to the block one get 8% all res from bandit you get 20 es more + 6% block but loose 1 passiv node on the tree ( you would have to divine 1 ring or your belt for 1 more cold res) but should be more efficient cause 2% block is each 1 passiv point and 20 es 1 passiv point too this is the shield the only szenario where it wouldnt be better is in a elemental weakness map but i dont think thats important at all cause flask would cap that aswell + atziri doesnt have that mod anyways , hope that helps

"

Alexlulz wrote:

"

stzbttln wrote:

currently using

81/110/106 resists, 8300 ES, 117K dps (vs 132.7k with lioneyes paws)

Will try double reflect as soon as I can.

edit: even double reflect is a joke, my ES doesn't move even by using absolutely no flasks at all. Will probably stick with this set up for a little while, I like the 8300 ES for leveling and the dps isn't that bad (from 132.7k to 117k)

switch your shield to the block one get 8% all res from bandit you get 20 es more + 6% block but loose 1 passiv node on the tree ( you would have to divine 1 ring or your belt for 1 more cold res) but should be more efficient cause 2% block is each 1 passiv point and 20 es 1 passiv point too this is the shield

the only szenario where it wouldnt be better is in a elemental weakness map but i dont think thats important at all cause flask would cap that aswell + atziri doesnt have that mod anyways , hope that helps

I already use the bandit passive. I know your position on the subject.

That fact is, if you want to use onslaught song, you need a perfect lightning resist belt, rainbowstrides, and a 38%+ lightning resist shavs, or your lightning resist will not be capped. I would obviously never spend passive or a suffix on block, when you can already reach 70% with a flask, and when you can survive double reflect without even using said flask.

I won't have time to argue about this anymore, it's ok that you like onslaught song and you don't like my shield, you can promote your friend's items all you want.

We can let people choose to have 5% block vs being res capped

So what you are using in the end? tree/gear? Since your first post looks like random thoughts/tests :)

id love such a shield with pure es mods and 3 res :)

"

qquno wrote:

So what you are using in the end? tree/gear? Since your first post looks like random thoughts/tests :)

updated main post with my current setup.

updated main post again, I tried running single reflect maps without life leech gem. Phys reflect is not noticeable at all, elemental reflect isn't either.

I haven't tried double reflect without life leech gem, I would rather wait until I hit 99. I feel it is possible, but it will rely heavily on flasks.