Do Acrobatics and Iron Reflexes Play Nice Together?
I'm making a character that uses all evasion gear and uses iron reflexes to turn that into armor. If I put a point into Acrobatics, does the 50% less armor debuff affect the armor I gain from the evasion > armor conversion, essentially halving the effects from iron reflexes? Or does it cut 50% of my armor BEFORE the conversion?
How do these two keystones cooperate now? This thread has been automatically archived. Replies are disabled.
|
![]() |
No, they do not cooperate.
|
![]() |
You can't "out-combine" drawbacks. So, yes, it cuts your armor by 50% after the conversion.
IGN: Scordalia_
|
![]() |
" Yes you can. CI + Ghost Reaver + Vaal Pact anyone? Also see Unwavering Stance + Tempest Shield. Face it, all of your suggestions are worse than this idea: http://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/657756 Last edited by dudiobugtron#4663 on Nov 7, 2013, 3:04:50 PM
|
![]() |
" Drawback of CI: 1 life Drawback of Ghost Reaver: Can't leech to your health pool Drawback of Vaal Pact: Can't regain health via regeneration / flasks. I suppose you're 'out-combining' CI's possible drawback of not being able to naturally recover ES mid-combat? |
![]() |
Determination can get rid of the 50% less by adding 50+% more. So in essence you could run an aura to remove the downside of Acrobatics and using armor.
|
![]() |
" No you're "out-combining" the draw backs of vaal pact because you already can't use flasks. so you lose nothing. Also unwavering stance + iron reflex (iron reflex removes draw-back of unwavering stance and vice versa, because you can't evade anyways, other than the base 5%) Last edited by Ardziv#1837 on Nov 8, 2013, 1:13:15 AM
|
![]() |
"And that's still left with the drawback of stacking pure Ar with IR being net loss in potential defenses against all but the largest hits. IGN - PlutoChthon, Talvathir
|
![]() |
" That would leave you with 75% Armour, not 100%. They're multiplicative, so it's 100/2*2 = 75. Still a good ol' bonus though. |
![]() |
You're both misreading and misrepresenting as what you misread at the same time. Theoretically they would cancel out if it was twice as efficient, but practically it just is not.
|
![]() |