"Has an Abyssal socket" actually REROLLS ALL SOCKETS
Back here with another bug report on fossils. This one was painful to test, with hollow fossils costing 90c as well as 4 socket resonators costing 90c...
![]() Normally with encrusted crafting, like with perfect, it keeps the white sockets as does it keep the quality over max when you scour. However, Hollow Fossils appear to be bugged in that they don't simply add an abyssal socket, replacing the bottom-left most one, they reroll them as well, wiping out white sockets. Last bumped on Oct 8, 2018, 8:57:01 PM
This thread has been automatically archived. Replies are disabled.
| |
Bump.
| |
An Abyssal Socket is a mod on the item. Upon adding or removing the mod, it will re-roll all the sockets on the item.
The reason why your White sockets and Quality remains when you Scour an item is because neither of those are mods on the item. This is intended behavior, sorry for the confusion. | |
If it's intended behavior, it's weirdly worded and/or shouldn't be intended?
"Has an Abyssal Socket" implies it simply overwrites or reserves a socket. It doesn't say "Rerolls sockets, making one socket an Abyssal Socket" Given how abyssal sockets behave on items, always in the last position and how they aren't modified by socket currency, they act like they're they're their own reserved section of an items sockets for all the abyssal socket items previously in the game. The rerolling sockets seems to be completely arbitrary. It just seems like that just never came up with how the previous uniques in the game can't be chanced so there were never such an oddity coming up with how they were programmed. If it is intended, shouldn't the wording be changed to match the intent? It always sucks in this game when you spend a potentially significant amount of currency (hollow fossils are rare, and go for almost an exalt) to figure out the behavior doesn't match the description. This is different from something like double corruption where it's vague and doesn't say exactly what the outcomes could be. This is saying one thing and doing another. Last edited by Hop#6184 on Oct 8, 2018, 8:58:47 PM
|