Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support DONE!!!!!

tens of thousands of players not voicing their dislike > 910 posters... so vast majority is fine with it.
"
Turtledove wrote:
"
Fruz wrote:
"
mezmery wrote:
0.01% significant indeed

Even if it's not 0.01%, we've tried to explain him how is statistics were pointless ....
He has been explained that a rough estimation of the complainers would be [vocal complainers]*25, regardless of the population stat (which is then easy to compare to the steam population, and if we assume that steam is about half - no idea bout that - then, the whole population ).

But it just goes nowhere here.


Only Fruz has claimed such a silly thing. Fruz doesn't even seem to understand the difference between multiplication and division and so any mathematics from him is meaningless.

Nop

I quoted the original quote and showed it to you in the other thread, as simple as it was, you were not able to comprehend it, neither the Bayesian inference (this one is more complicated) that you had not been using at all, making your big joke of a list even more pointless.



And we don't need statistics, the labs are still there, and the ascendancy points are still in those, with Uber unchanged, and merciless barely changed.
SSF is not and will never be a standard for balance, it is not for people entitled to getting more without trading.
"
Fruz wrote:

Nop

I quoted the original quote and showed it to you in the other thread, as simple as it was, you were not able to comprehend it, neither the Bayesian inference (this one is more complicated) that you had not been using at all, making your big joke of a list even more pointless.



And we don't need statistics, the labs are still there, and the ascendancy points are still in those, with Uber unchanged, and merciless barely changed.


Not true, you're confusing the population outside the forums who have way below a 1 in 25 chance of complaining with people posting on the forums who have a much higher probability of sharing their view.
Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support (thread # 1702621) Thank you all! GGG will implement a different method for ascension in PoE2. Retired!
No I'm not.

"A typical business hears from 4% of it's dissatisfied customers."
From a random website of the internet.

"For every customer who complains, there are 26 customers who don’t say anything."
From another.

It does not specify anything about the other users being aware of the available media to complain or not, it's likely already been taking into account.

Plus angry customers have much much more incentive to find the media to complain on top of that
( than people that would give "positive feedback" ).
People coming here only to complain shows it.

SSF is not and will never be a standard for balance, it is not for people entitled to getting more without trading.
Last edited by Fruz#6137 on Aug 3, 2017, 2:05:59 AM
It's just human habit:

If you buy something and it is according to your expectations, you'll only rarley give positive feedback.

Howeverif you buy something and your expectations aren't met by far, then you'll voice your opinion.

Just remember school: How often at the end of the day did you tell the teacher s/he/it did a good job? Hardly ever I assume - because you were expecting her/him/it to do a good job.

However if the teacher did something bad, you'd talk to your friends about it how much the teach sucked today...
"
Fruz wrote:
No I'm not.

"A typical business hears from 4% of it's dissatisfied customers."
From a random website of the internet.

"For every customer who complains, there are 26 customers who don’t say anything."
From another.

It does not specify anything about the other users being aware of the available media to complain or not, it's likely already been taking into account.

Plus angry customers have much much more incentive to find the media to complain on top of that
( than people that would give "positive feedback" ).
People coming here only to complain shows it.



All misdirected and poorly thought out, the facts are:

1. A free to play game is not going to have nearly as many dissatisfied customers that complain as a product with paying customers.

2. The point was that the list of 919 names could be useful to GGG in determining the number of customers that dislike labyrinth. Thank you for finally admitting that.

3. GGG might have even used the number in the list to conclude that they needed to do something about labyrinth. Or maybe it was the just the huge shit load of complaints on the forums. Or more likely a combination of everything they saw. So they have done away with a significant amount of the trap gauntlets in the first two labyrinths.

4. Your stated purpose here was to make sure that GGG didn't cave in to the cry babies complaining about labyrinth. GGG caved.
Over 430 threads discussing labyrinth problems with over 1040 posters in support (thread # 1702621) Thank you all! GGG will implement a different method for ascension in PoE2. Retired!
Last edited by Turtledove#4014 on Aug 3, 2017, 3:26:29 AM
"
Turtledove wrote:


Your 0.01% figure is more of your made up nonsense? Are you not able or just unwilling to stop your constant generation of nonsense?

oh, sorry, i messed up a bit. so 920 or of 20 mil registered accounts (you cant play ther game without registratiooin on forums, it's not like blizz bnet, where you may not know that forum exists).
so
920\20000000*100, it's 0.0046%. almost twice less. im really sorry for that error.
No rest for the wicked
Where do you get the number 20 million regged accs from?
"
hyper_ch wrote:
Where do you get the number 20 million regged accs from?

read on some resourse in late 2016.
still for mid 2015 it's more like 12mil
No rest for the wicked
Last edited by mezmery#2042 on Aug 3, 2017, 4:20:20 AM
I didn't think there were so many players.... I thought maybe 100-200k.

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info