SET FREE THE ASCENDANCY POINTS (or rework the lab) [New ascension methods/lab rework ideas]

"
Nishrek wrote:
"
raics wrote:
Where are your role playing instincts people?

If I want to focus on Role Play I will play Pillars Of Eternity (or even better D&D with some friends), not Path of Exile.


Gee, I wonder, do you know what ARPG stands for..?
Carry on my waypoint son, there'll be peace when maps are done.
Lay your portal gem to rest, don't you die no more.

'Cause it's a bitter sweet symphony this league.
Try to make maps meet, you're a slave to the meta, then you leave.
"
Xavathos wrote:
"
Nishrek wrote:
"
raics wrote:
Where are your role playing instincts people?

If I want to focus on Role Play I will play Pillars Of Eternity (or even better D&D with some friends), not Path of Exile.


Gee, I wonder, do you know what ARPG stands for..?


He knows.

With all the power creep screen blow-up and frogger/pitfall/super mario now, PoE more closely resembles something out of the shootemup/platformer genres than an ARPG.
"
Turtledove wrote:
Or perhaps I'm misunderstanding and you're saying that the whole Feedback and Suggestions forum should be deleted to make it clear that there is no feedback or suggestions allowed?

You are, what I'm saying all this time is that FB&S subforum should, obviously enough, be a place for feedback and suggestions, not lobbying, petitioning, hatemongering, demanding, nagging and so on. Yeah, yeah, I know we're technically allowed to do all those things but should we really? And I do realize devs probably have a simple 'no negotiations with terrorists' policy in place so it isn't really doing anything but it's still bad form.

"
The_Reporter wrote:
Anything can be done with 'lore' to make things make better sense. Heck, look at that last lore nugget from raics for example. :)

Shit yes, retcon is a place on earth but I suppose it's best avoided if possible.
Wish the armchair developers would go back to developing armchairs.

◄[www.moddb.com/mods/balancedux]►
◄[www.moddb.com/mods/one-vision1]►
"
Severance2hBlade wrote:
Though admittedly the connection to Lore is a problem. I have no idea what rules apply in this case. Can't we or can't we not change the Lore (if we wanted to - "we" as in GGG). But "change" is such a heavy word, why not "modify"? Reason would suggest that it's not something belonging to the realm of the impossible.

I did suggest once that every major race/nation in the game world (maraketh, karui, vaal, ezomyte) might have a form of ascendancy trials and they could be very different from lab. The problem with that is the following - if that becomes a method of introducing new sets of ascendancies you will still have to do lab if you want imperial ascendancies and if it's just an alternate method for the current set who's gonna pay for it?

There were quite a few people getting pissed about money being spent on the XBOX port because they won't play it so we can probably assume that players which are fine with the lab would get pissed that resources are going for something as frivolous as an alternative. Mind you, XBOX port has an extenuating factor of potentially being able to bring more money back than was spent if it becomes popular. That likely wouldn't be the case with a lab alternative, you can't hype something that might be interpreted as a bandaid for a blunder and the amount of potential customers it could pull back is suspect.

Which does bring me to something, if GGG released a separate set of supporter packs with the intention to fund a lab alternative would you buy it?
Wish the armchair developers would go back to developing armchairs.

◄[www.moddb.com/mods/balancedux]►
◄[www.moddb.com/mods/one-vision1]►
They could give Non Lab points another name. I don't care if they are called Bilbo Baggins points for the non lab lovers as long as we get them.
"
raics wrote:
"
Nishrek wrote:
Gives option only to fight Izaro for AP. No loot, no XP, nothing except AP. Easy to implement and resolves problems.

And doesn't fit the lore. Imagine that after all that effort Eternals expended to improve the traditional Azmeri labyrinth trial some jackalope just strode in and asked to become a supreme&omnipotent ruler without running it. Talk about anticlimactic.


But it's ok for the lore for you to ask some 15 year old kid with a mouth breathing lab build to do it for you.

"Bilbo thought of going up the volcano. But he didn't want to hurt his feet so he paid george 2 chaos to do it for him."

If POE wrote lord of the rings this is how it would end.
"
Nishrek wrote:
"
raics wrote:
It effort Eternals expended to improve the traditional Azmeri labyrinth trial some jackalope just strode in and asked to become a supreme&omnipotent ruler without running it. Talk about anticlimactic.

Hogwash.
This is the weakest (I do not want to call it stupid) argument defending the lab
1* If I have to choose consistent role vs better gameplay, the choice obvious. Fixing broken game design, is more important than full adherence to the lore
2* Heck, if you want to be 100% consistent with the lore, it may be explained in this way:
"Azmeri secretly built shortcut to Ascendancy chamber, to reward clever people, who can be smart enough to find this shortcut. Izaro found this passage, he is afraid that we want to prison him again, so he fights with us."
Voila, we are good with lore again!

TL:DR Lore can never be an excuse for a bad design


Plus 90% of people care about gameplay and don't give a #$%$%# about lore pretty art repetitive voice overs and the like.

The game play changes all this other stuff gets boring on pass thru 2.
"
raics wrote:
"
Severance2hBlade wrote:
Though admittedly the connection to Lore is a problem. I have no idea what rules apply in this case. Can't we or can't we not change the Lore (if we wanted to - "we" as in GGG). But "change" is such a heavy word, why not "modify"? Reason would suggest that it's not something belonging to the realm of the impossible.

I did suggest once that every major race/nation in the game world (maraketh, karui, vaal, ezomyte) might have a form of ascendancy trials and they could be very different from lab. The problem with that is the following - if that becomes a method of introducing new sets of ascendancies you will still have to do lab if you want imperial ascendancies and if it's just an alternate method for the current set who's gonna pay for it?

There were quite a few people getting pissed about money being spent on the XBOX port because they won't play it so we can probably assume that players which are fine with the lab would get pissed that resources are going for something as frivolous as an alternative. Mind you, XBOX port has an extenuating factor of potentially being able to bring more money back than was spent if it becomes popular. That likely wouldn't be the case with a lab alternative, you can't hype something that might be interpreted as a bandaid for a blunder and the amount of potential customers it could pull back is suspect.

Which does bring me to something, if GGG released a separate set of supporter packs with the intention to fund a lab alternative would you buy it?


Pay to win is pay to win. Paying 20 dollars is like paying 20 dollars to avoid paying 2c.

The problem is they added an out so people just pay it and do not complain.
"
Zalhan2 wrote:
Pay to win is pay to win. Paying 20 dollars is like paying 20 dollars to avoid paying 2c.

In what way is paying for everybody pay to win?
Wish the armchair developers would go back to developing armchairs.

◄[www.moddb.com/mods/balancedux]►
◄[www.moddb.com/mods/one-vision1]►
"
The_Reporter wrote:
He knows.

With all the power creep screen blow-up and frogger/pitfall/super mario now, PoE more closely resembles something out of the shootemup/platformer genres than an ARPG.


...we're clearly playing a different game then. Why don't you start yours and tell me what the title screen says?
Carry on my waypoint son, there'll be peace when maps are done.
Lay your portal gem to rest, don't you die no more.

'Cause it's a bitter sweet symphony this league.
Try to make maps meet, you're a slave to the meta, then you leave.

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info