Jewels roll sugestion - increased area of effect

Please, make a new roll for all jewels types "increased area of effect"... with this new roll we can use another gem in the place of "increased area of effect" if we got like 40% or more area of effect granted but many jewels, it will be awesome! i think the rolls could be like 5-12%

"

sevazinho wrote:

Please, make a new roll for all jewels types "increased area of effect"... with this new roll we can use another gem in the place of "increased area of effect" if we got like 40% or more area of effect granted but many jewels, it will be awesome! i think the rolls could be like 5-12%

5-12 is way to much in my opinion

a normal increased AoE is 4%
so that's wat the stat should be for a jewel or somthing around that

should it ever come to exist

The point is to create the possibility to swap the "increased area of effect" gem to anothers in many builds, creating much more variety. So 4% increased area of effect is nothing! But if you have this range of rolls that i've suggested (5-12%), you can have around 60% increased area of effect with 5 jewels and this is almost the same as a level 17 gem.

With this increased area provided by jewels we can swap the increased area gem for another one boosting elemental damage like hypothermia or ice bite, or in melee builds we can swap for fortify or added fire or physical damage...

"

sevazinho wrote:

Please, make a new roll for all jewels types "increased area of effect"... with this new roll we can use another gem in the place of "increased area of effect" if we got like 40% or more area of effect granted but many jewels, it will be awesome! i think the rolls could be like 5-12%

I agree with this, I found out to be weird that jewel don't have increase aoe. mod.

"

sevazinho wrote:

The point is to create the possibility to swap the "increased area of effect" gem to anothers in many builds, creating much more variety. So 4% increased area of effect is nothing! But if you have this range of rolls that i've suggested (5-12%), you can have around 60% increased area of effect with 5 jewels and this is almost the same as a level 17 gem.

With this increased area provided by jewels we can swap the increased area gem for another one boosting elemental damage like hypothermia or ice bite, or in melee builds we can swap for fortify or added fire or physical damage...

And why should some jewels be good enough to completely replace an entire support gem?

"

Telzen wrote:

"

sevazinho wrote:

The point is to create the possibility to swap the "increased area of effect" gem to anothers in many builds, creating much more variety. So 4% increased area of effect is nothing! But if you have this range of rolls that i've suggested (5-12%), you can have around 60% increased area of effect with 5 jewels and this is almost the same as a level 17 gem.

With this increased area provided by jewels we can swap the increased area gem for another one boosting elemental damage like hypothermia or ice bite, or in melee builds we can swap for fortify or added fire or physical damage...

And why should some jewels be good enough to completely replace an entire support gem?

^This

What would be possible however is a unique jewel with something like this

Radiant amplifier

25% More increased radius of AOE nodes
25% less damage

A direct increase to the efficiency of all AOE nodes in the passive tree for a direct reduction in power of the skills used.

Arbitrary numbers obviously.

Peace,

-Boem-

"

And why should some jewels be good enough to completely replace an entire support gem?

Because if we can take off an gem in the 6l build we create more variety of builds. i've more than 50% increased damage because of my jewels and because of it i dont need to take some increased damage nodes and could put more defensives ones in my builds... this game is all about customization, you can make your build as you want, so why not let people create new ones?! If you dont like this sugestion just dont use it, because i'm sure that other will like.

But to do this change viable you will need a lot of jewels with higher rolls in increased area of effect + some added damage rolls, so its not simple as you imagine.

Inc. AOE is pretty sparse on the tree probably due to the massive effect it has on clearspeed for many builds. That's why they don't let you stack it sky-high without sacrificing something else like a support slot - or your weapon.

They made these
specifically for FBs, and you can't use more than one either.

Peaple ,Martial Atritry Greamson Jewl can not be use with Concentrate Efect Supot Gem , becuose we ned 8 jewel lick this to make 50% extra Damage

ya i think the idea is that increased aoe is so ridiculously strong that they want to severely limit the sources of it.

Its not build enabling, lets be honest, you take out the aoe gem and just stick in a more multiplier, its the same build just with 40% more damage. Or you stick in the aoe gem anyway and have absolutely ridiculous aoe that offscreens x2.

They asked why we dont have aoe nodes in the melee area and they basically said its so desirable that if you put it there then everyone has to make a build that goes to those nodes because if its easy to get its a no brainer, you get it.