[1.0.4] CI Flameblast/Infernal Mantle Burning Witch - updated! farm 73map with friendly gears

我參考了reddit上面的討論並且得到很多有用的資訊。(http://www.reddit.com/r/pathofexile/comments/1ti2es/discussion_flameblast_builds)
今天是1.0.4更新後的第二天，所以我的技能石只練到16級。

1.優點

主要的傷害來自於點燃後的燃燒傷害，所以就算我沒點吸血瞬回，基本上也是不會怕反傷怪的。
PS.不過如果你的裝備超好，還是建議分析一下你的傷害在遇到多少反傷怪的時候要喝火抗水。

2.影片

a.農70圖 - 不要忘記我的寶石只有16等喔~

連結: http://youtu.be/AKBSajbJeuE


b.農73圖 - 寶石等級18。示範便宜的裝備就可以打高等圖。

連結: http://youtu.be/a-3V_g7QMPo


從這個影片可以看到傷害相當高，73圖的石頭橘王我只打一下他就死了，第二下其實不用放他也會被燒死。(燃燒持續時間有6.6秒) 我的裝備算很普通，除了6連火衣超過2ex之外，其他都算蠻平價的。其實用5連火衣也不會太差，而且5連火衣在SC大概只有3ex。如果你覺得自己的傷害夠高了，也可以考慮穿 護甲/ES 或 純ES 甲。

PS.我的傳奇鞋是舊版的，也只比新版多12%全抗，其實買新版就可以，SC大概1-2ex。

3.技能和連線

a.烈火爆破(flameblast)

4連 - 元素擴散 - 機率點燃 - 生命吸取

5連 - 元素擴散 - 機率點燃 - 生命吸取 - 快速施法

6連 - 元素擴散 - 機率點燃 - 生命吸取 - 快速施法 - (增加燃燒傷害 / 火焰穿透)


b.寒流

3連 - 元素擴散 - 技能範圍加大

4連 - 元素擴散 - 技能範圍加大 - Q20加冰傷/ 賦予 / 陷阱


c.受傷施放(等級1)

2連 - 戰吼(等級5)

3連 - 戰吼(等級5) - 熔岩護盾(等級7)

4連 - 戰吼(等級5) - 熔岩護盾(等級7) - 鮮血狂怒(等級1-5)


4.天賦樹

CI女巫

99點: http://goo.gl/AeY0wK

113點(第一個影片中的天賦): http://goo.gl/RIeip6
113點(第二個影片中的天賦): http://goo.gl/JUxK9d

111點(防禦面比較好): http://goo.gl/9xZsv4

生命流貴族

110點: http://goo.gl/q8jWtL

如果有法力問題可以用這個天賦: http://goo.gl/bAOGVQ


5.盜賊任務獎勵

第一難度： +1技能點
第二難度： +1技能點 或 +4%施法速度
第三難度： +1技能點

6.升級天賦樹

Lv20: http://goo.gl/nhV1N0

Lv40: http://goo.gl/E7IWX5

Lv60: http://goo.gl/5SvRg7

什麼時後轉換到ES，根據你的裝備來決定。

7.元素平衡(EE)對這個玩法的效果


===問與答===

First, fire pen affected only hit damage. It means burning damage was increased from the more hit damage, but the resistance of the monsters was not changed at burning stage.

Using fire pen

1.More total damage

According to 7.A, we could analyse them quickly. Assumed fire resistance(R) is 0.

With Lv20Q20 fire pen (hit damage = D x 1.85): total damage is D x 5.6906.

with Lv20 increased burning damage (B = 4.05): total damage is D x 5.145.

2.More mana cost

Mana cost multiplier: fire pen = 140% / increased burning damage = 120%
According to my char, mana cost is 34 per stage with fire pen / 29 with inc burning damage.
If cast speed is 113%, it means time per sec is 7.1 times.

Mana cost per sec with fire pen = 34 x 7.1 = 241.4

Mana cost per sec with increased burning damage = 29 x 7.1 = 205.9

3.More dangerous at reflect

Fire pen raised the hit damage, so it's the more dangerous at elemental reflect. Burning damage wasn't reflected.

Conclusion

If you want the more damage, choose fire pen. If you want the safer at reflect or less mana cost, choose increased burning damage.

If i picked EE, the rotation is the following.

1.cast Cold Snap

2.enemies +25% cold resist, -50% Fire and lighting resist

3.cast Flameblast << the more damage than skill without EE

4.enemies +25% fire resist, -50% cold and lighting resist

5.Burning stage << ??


In burning stage, enemies owned additional 25% fire resistance. That seem to reduce burning damage. But when the hit damage is increased, it means burning damage is also increased. So it's the better or worse to pick EE in this build? I analyse the result by math. If it's incorrect, please tell me. I will correct it.

Assumed:

Fire skill damage = D

Burning Bounus = B
= 1 + % increased fire damage + % increased burning damage + % increased damage over time
= 1 + (66%+55%) + 80% + 45% *** 66% from passive tree, 55% from gears
= 3.46

Enemies fire resistance = R

Hit damage
= the damage to hit enemies by fire skill
= [Fire skill damage] x [% reduced damage from fire resistance]

Burning damage
= [Hit damage] x 20% x 4sec x [Burning Bounus] x [% reduced damage from fire resistance]


Without EE:

Hit damage = D x (1 - R)

Burning damage
= [D x (1-R)] x [0.2 x 4 x B] x [1-R]
= D x 0.8B x [1 - 2R + R^2]


Total damage
= [Hit damage] + [Burning damage]
= D x [3.768 - 6.536R + 2.768R^2]


With EE:

Hit damage
= D x [1 - (R-50%)]
= D x [1.5 - R]

Burning damage
= [D x (1.5 - R)] x [0.2 x 4 x B] x [1 - (R+25%)]
= D x 0.8B x [1.125 - 2.25R + R^2]


Total damage
= [Hit damage] + [Burning damage]
= D x [4.614 - 7.228R + 2.768R^2]


Compared [3.768 - 6.536R + 2.768R^2](blue line) with [4.614 - 7.228R + 2.768R^2](green line) by chart.




Y value of green line is always the better than blue line. It means the damage with EE is always the better.

So we know EE offer the more damage in this build. :)

PS.May you be cofused about why i didn't pick EE in my char. Actually, i used many regrets in order to get the better build. I ever tried to do high critical chance build, but that didn't make me satisfied. The reason without EE is "i used out my regrets". XD If you paid attention to watch my video, you could find the map owned EE mod.

PS2. When fire resistance of enemies is over 75%, the burning damage would be 0 and it's not minus. So Green line is incorrect at x > 0.75. Y value should be larger.

You should read my the first analysis about EE before reading this post.

If you have read the first analysis, i would talk about the influence of [% increased fire damage + % increased burning damage + % increased damage over time] on damage with EE or without EE today.

Assumed

Fire skill damage = D

Burning Bounus = B
= 1 + % increased fire damage + % increased burning damage + % increased damage over time

Burning duration = Bt

Burning damage
= [Hit damage] x 20% x [Burning duration] x [Burning Bonus] x [% reduced damage from fire resistance]
= [Hit damage] x [0.2 x Bt x B] x [% reduced damage from fire resistance]


Without EE

Hit damage
= Hd
= D x (1 - R)

Burning dmage
= Bd
= D x [0.2 x Bt x B] x [1 - 2R + R^2]

Total damage
= Td
= Hd + Bd


With EE

Hit damage
= HdE
= D x (1.5 - R)

Burning dmage
= BdE
= D x [0.2 x Bt x B] x [1.125 - 2.25R + R^2]

Total damage
= TdE
= HdE + BdE


1.Compared [1 - R] (green line) with [1.5 - R] (purple line) by chart 1.



Purple line always won the fixed value, 0.5. It means HdE is always the larger than Hd, and the value is 0.5D.


2. Compared [1 - 2R + R^2](red line) with [1.125 - 2.25R + R^2](blue line) by chart 2.



We can find the burning damage with EE(blue line) is the better before fire resistance(R) is over 50%. Y value of blue line(burning damage with EE) is zero when R is over 75%.

Analysis

We care about when Td > TdE. Because HdE > Hd, we should find when Bd > BdE. The answer is R > 50% from chart 2. When R = 75%, [Bd - BdE] is the largest. It means [Td > TdE] is the easiest at this condition.

So lets analyse how to make [Td > TdE], when R = 75%.

1.Bt = 4 sec.

Hd = D x (1 - R) = 0.25D

Bd
= D x [0.2 x Bt x B] x [1 - 2R + R^2]
= D x [0.8B] x 0.0625

HdE = D x (1.5 - R) = 0.75D

BdE = 0

Td = Hd + Bd

TdE = HdE + BdE

Td > TdE
=> Hd + Bd > HdE + BdE
=> Bd > [HdE - Hd] + BdE
=> D x [0.8B] x 0.0625 > [0.5D] + 0
=> B > 10 = 1000%

B = 1 + % increased fire damage + % increased burning damage + % increased damage over time

It means the damage without EE would be the better when [% increased fire damage + % increased burning damage + % increased damage over time] is over 900%.


2.Bt = 5.8 sec (30% increased ignite duration from "Chance to Ignite" & 15% from Elemental Proliferation)

Bd
= D x [0.2 x Bt x B] x [1 - 2R + R^2]
= D x [1.16B] x 0.0625

Td > TdE
=> Hd + Bd > HdE + BdE
=> Bd > [HdE - Hd] + BdE
=> D x [1.16B] x 0.0625 > [0.5D] + 0
=> B > 6.90 = 690%

It means the damage without EE would be the better when [% increased fire damage + % increased burning damage + % increased damage over time] is over 590%.


3.Bt = 6.6 sec (30% from "Chance to Ignite" & 15% from Elemental Proliferation & 20% from Q20 Flammability)

Bd
= D x [0.2 x Bt x B] x [1 - 2R + R^2]
= D x [1.32B] x 0.0625

Td > TdE
=> Hd + Bd > HdE + BdE
=> Bd > [HdE - Hd] + BdE
=> D x [1.32B] x 0.0625 > [0.5D] + 0
=> B > 6.06 = 606%

It means the damage without EE would be the better when [% increased fire damage + % increased burning damage + % increased damage over time] is over 506%.


Conclusion

When the fire resistance of the enemies is 50% to 99.9% and your [% increased fire damage + % increased burning damage + % increased damage over time] is over 506%, the damage without EE would be the better.
Or EE would offer the more damage! Actually, it's not easy to achieve 506%.

Edit: just pick EE!