Group loot poll
|
Lol.
You edited in a 7. Shows how childish you are. |
|
|
5
Else, i really do not want to party up. I play for recreational purpose. Do not want to get frustrated. DMT:
Load universe into a gun. Aim at brain. Fire. |
|
|
#5
The devs seem to think competing for loot is fun. I don't think it's fun so I feel forced into playing alone. I could live with #3 as well. |
|
|
#3
First I wanted to vote 7 to be cool, then i realized it is the same as 'leave it as it is now'. Nothing wrong with this thread, simple data gathering. Although real poll would be better than this. If #3 wasnt possible I would go with real FFA (no timers, no names). ✠ ✠
|
|
|
Add a number for keeping FFA and adding in numbers 3 and 5.
Best for everybody. There is nothing wrong with this thread, get over yourselves its a free country. Standard Forever Last edited by iamstryker#5952 on Nov 1, 2012, 8:38:54 PM
|
|
|
#5
|
|
" Depending on which country you live in maybe. |
|
|
5 but only because I have to pick 1.
Options> |
|
" " LOL So much fail. I'm not surprised I disagree with people with these attitudes. " ... to let them know the game isn’t going to be very fair from here on out."
- Qarl |
|
|
another option :)
Not that I have any loot issues, but, there are other ways A version of instanced loot per player, but after say 1-2 mins the loot would be FFA An assignment of loot decided by team leaders : 1 FFA, 2. equal shared drops ( ie if player a got yellow lst monster player b would get yellow assigned to them) 3. random drops per player (luck) 4. Instanced 5. instanced with timer Not everything the developers would have "time" to deploy but there are more options SO far I have no problem with ffa, and will gladly give up stuff to other players (too much stash anyway) |
|
